# Pricing Asian Options

This example shows how to price a European Asian option using six methods in the Financial Instruments Toolbox™. This example demonstrates four closed form approximations (Kemna-Vorst, Levy, Turnbull-Wakeman, and Haug-Haug-Margrabe), a lattice model (Cox-Ross-Rubinstein), and Monte Carlo simulation. All these methods involve some tradeoffs between numerical accuracy and computational efficiency. This example also demonstrates how variations in spot prices, volatility, and strike prices affect option prices on European Vanilla and Asian options.

### Overview of Asian Options

Asian options are securities with payoffs that depend on the average value of an underlying asset over a specific period of time. Underlying assets can be stocks, commodities, or financial indices.

Two types of Asian options are found in the market: average price options and average strike options. Average price options have a fixed strike value and the average used is the asset price. Average strike options have a strike equal to the average value of the underlying asset.

The payoff at maturity of an average price European Asian option is:

$max\left(0,Savg-K\right)$ for a call

$max\left(0,K-Savg\right)$ for a put

The payoff at maturity of an average strike European Asian option is:

$max\left(0,St-Savg\right)$ for a call

$max\left(0,Savg-St\right)$ for a put

where Savg is the average price of underlying asset, St is the price at maturity of underlying asset, and K is the strike price.

The average can be arithmetic or geometric.

### Pricing Asian Options Using Closed Form Approximations

The Financial Instruments Toolbox™ supports four closed form approximations for European Average Price options. The Kemna-Vorst method is based on the geometric mean of the price of the underlying during the life of the option [1]. The Levy and Turnbull-Wakeman models provide a closed form pricing solution to continuous arithmetic averaging options [2,3]. The Haug-Haug-Margrabe approximation is used for pricing discrete arithmetic averaging options [4].

All the pricing functions `asianbykv`, `asianbylevy`, `asianbytw`, and `asianbyhhm` take an interest-rate term structure and stock structure as inputs.

Consider the following example:

```% Create RateSpec from the interest rate term structure StartDates = '12-March-2014'; EndDates = '12-March-2020'; Rates = 0.035; Compounding = -1; Basis = 1; RateSpec = intenvset('ValuationDate', StartDates, 'StartDates', StartDates, ... 'EndDates', EndDates, 'Rates', Rates, 'Compounding', ... Compounding, 'Basis', Basis); % Define StockSpec with the underlying asset information Sigma = 0.20; AssetPrice = 100; StockSpec = stockspec(Sigma, AssetPrice); % Define the Asian option Settle = '12-March-2014'; ExerciseDates = '12-March-2015'; Strike = 90; OptSpec = 'call'; % Kemna-Vorst closed form model PriceKV = asianbykv(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); % Levy model approximation PriceLevy = asianbylevy(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); % Turnbull-Wakeman approximation PriceTW = asianbytw(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); % Haug-Haug-Margrabe approximation PriceHHM = asianbyhhm(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); % Comparison of calculated prices for the geometric and arithmetic options % using different closed form algorithms. displayPricesClosedForm(PriceKV, PriceLevy, PriceTW, PriceHHM)```
```Comparison of Asian Arithmetic and Geometric Prices: Kemna-Vorst: 11.862580 Levy: 12.164734 Turnbull-Wakeman: 12.164734 Haug-Haug-Margrabe: 12.108746 ```

### Computing Asian Options Prices Using the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Model

In addition to closed form approximations, the Financial Instruments Toolbox™ supports pricing European Average Price options using CRR trees via the function `asianbycrr`.

The lattice pricing function `asianbycrr` takes an interest-rate tree ( `CRRTree` ) and stock structure as inputs. You can price the previous options by building a `CRRTree` using the interest-rate term structure and stock specification from the example above.

```% Create the time specification of the tree NPeriods = 20; TreeValuationDate = '12-March-2014'; TreeMaturity = '12-March-2024'; TimeSpec = crrtimespec(TreeValuationDate, TreeMaturity, NPeriods); % Build the tree CRRTree = crrtree(StockSpec, RateSpec, TimeSpec); % Price the European Asian option using the CRR lattice model. % The function 'asianbycrr' computes prices of arithmetic and geometric % Asian options. AvgType = {'arithmetic';'geometric'}; AmericanOpt = 0; PriceCRR20 = asianbycrr(CRRTree, OptSpec, Strike, Settle, ExerciseDates,... AmericanOpt, AvgType); % Increase the numbers of periods in the tree and compare results NPeriods = 40; TimeSpec = crrtimespec(TreeValuationDate, TreeMaturity, NPeriods); CRRTree = crrtree(StockSpec, RateSpec, TimeSpec); PriceCRR40 = asianbycrr(CRRTree, OptSpec, Strike, Settle, ExerciseDates,... AmericanOpt, AvgType); % Display prices displayPricesCRR(PriceCRR20, PriceCRR40)```
```Asian Prices using the CRR lattice model: PriceArithmetic(CRR20): 11.934380 PriceArithmetic(CRR40): 12.047243 PriceGeometric (CRR20): 11.620899 PriceGeometric (CRR40): 11.732037 ```

The results above compare the findings from calculating both geometric and arithmetic Asian options, using CRR trees with 20 and 40 levels. As the number of levels increases, the results approach the closed form solutions.

### Calculating Prices of Asian Options Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Another method to price European Average Price options with the Financial Instruments Toolbox™ is via Monte Carlo simulations.

The pricing function `asianbyls` takes an interest-rate term structure and stock structure as inputs. The output and execution time of the Monte Carlo simulation depends on the number of paths ( `NumTrials` ) and the number of time periods per path ( `NumPeriods` ).

You can price the same options of previous examples using Monte Carlo.

```% Simulation Parameters NumTrials = 500; NumPeriods = 200; % Price the arithmetic option PriceAMC = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', NumTrials, ... 'NumPeriods', NumPeriods); % Price the geometric option PriceGMC = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', NumTrials, ... 'NumPeriods', NumPeriods, 'AvgType', AvgType(2)); % Use the antithetic variates method to value the options Antithetic = true; PriceAMCAntithetic = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', NumTrials, 'NumPeriods',... NumPeriods, 'Antithetic', Antithetic); PriceGMCAntithetic = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', NumTrials, 'NumPeriods',... NumPeriods, 'Antithetic', Antithetic,'AvgType', AvgType(2)); % Display prices displayPricesMonteCarlo(PriceAMC, PriceAMCAntithetic, PriceGMC, PriceGMCAntithetic)```
```Asian Prices using Monte Carlo Method: Arithmetic Asian Standard Monte Carlo: 12.304046 Variate Antithetic Monte Carlo: 12.304046 Geometric Asian Standard Monte Carlo: 12.048434 Variate Antithetic Monte Carlo: 12.048434 ```

The use of variate antithetic accelerates the conversion process by reducing the variance.

You can create a plot to display the difference between the geometric Asian price using the Kemna-Vorst model, standard Monte Carlo, and antithetic Monte Carlo.

```nTrials = [50:5:100 110:10:250 300:50:500 600:100:2500]'; PriceKVVector = PriceKV * ones(size(nTrials)); PriceGMCVector = nan(size(nTrials)); PriceGMCAntitheticVector = nan(size(nTrials)); TimeGMCAntitheticVector = nan(length(nTrials),1); TimeGMCVector = nan(length(nTrials),1); idx = 1; for iNumTrials = nTrials' PriceGMCVector(idx) = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', iNumTrials, 'NumPeriods',... NumPeriods,'AvgType', AvgType(2)); PriceGMCAntitheticVector(idx) = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', iNumTrials, 'NumPeriods',... NumPeriods, 'Antithetic', Antithetic,'AvgType', AvgType(2)); idx = idx+1; end figure('menubar', 'none', 'numbertitle', 'off') plot(nTrials, [PriceKVVector PriceGMCVector PriceGMCAntitheticVector]); title 'Variance Reduction by Antithetic' xlabel 'Number of Simulations' ylabel 'Asian Option Price' legend('Kemna-Vorst', 'Standard Monte Carlo', 'Variate Antithetic Monte Carlo ', 'location', 'northeast');```

The graph above shows how oscillation in simulated price is reduced by using variate antithetic.

### Compare Pricing Model Results

Prices calculated by the Monte Carlo method varies depending on the outcome of the simulations. Increase `NumTrials` and analyze the results.

```NumTrials = 2000; PriceAMCAntithetic2000 = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle, ExerciseDates,... 'NumTrials', NumTrials, 'NumPeriods', NumPeriods, 'Antithetic', Antithetic); PriceGMCAntithetic2000 = asianbyls(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates,'NumTrials', NumTrials, 'NumPeriods',... NumPeriods, 'Antithetic', Antithetic,'AvgType', AvgType(2)); % Comparison of calculated Asian call prices displayComparisonAsianCallPrices(PriceLevy, PriceTW, PriceHHM, PriceCRR40, PriceAMCAntithetic, PriceAMCAntithetic2000, PriceKV, PriceGMCAntithetic, PriceGMCAntithetic2000)```
```Comparison of Asian call prices: Arithmetic Asian Levy: 12.164734 Turnbull-Wakeman: 12.164734 Haug-Haug-Margrabe: 12.108746 Cox-Ross-Rubinstein: 12.047243 Monte Carlo(500 trials): 12.304046 Monte Carlo(2000 trials): 12.196848 Geometric Asian Kemna-Vorst: 11.862580 Cox-Ross-Rubinstein: 11.732037 Monte Carlo(500 trials): 12.048434 Monte Carlo(2000 trials): 11.932017 ```

The table above contrasts the results from closed approximation models against price simulations implemented via CRR trees and Monte Carlo.

### Asian and Vanilla Call Options

Asian options are popular instruments since they tend to be less expensive than comparable Vanilla calls and puts. This is because the volatility in the average value of an underlier tends to be lower than the volatility of the value of the underlier itself.

The Financial Instruments Toolbox™ supports several algorithms for pricing vanilla options. Let us compare the price of Asian options against their Vanilla counterpart.

First, compute the price of a European Vanilla Option using the Black Scholes model.

```PriceBLS = optstockbybls(RateSpec, StockSpec, Settle, ExerciseDates,... OptSpec, Strike); % Comparison of calculated call prices. displayComparisonVanillaAsian('Prices', PriceBLS, PriceKV, PriceLevy, PriceTW, PriceHHM)```
```Comparison of Vanilla and Asian Prices: Vanilla BLS: 15.743809 Asian Kemna-Vorst: 11.862580 Asian Levy: 12.164734 Asian Turnbull-Wakeman: 12.164734 Asian Haug-Haug-Margrabe: 12.108746 ```

Both geometric and arithmetic Asians price lower than their Vanilla counterpart.

You can analyze options prices at different levels of the underlying asset. Using the Financial Instruments Toolbox™, it is possible to observe the effect of different parameters on the price of the options. Consider for example, the effect of variations in the price of the underlying asset.

```StockPrices = (50:5:150)'; PriceBLS = nan(size(StockPrices)); PriceKV = nan(size(StockPrices)); PriceLevy = nan(size(StockPrices)); PriceTW = nan(size(StockPrices)); PriceHHM = nan(size(StockPrices)); idx = 1; for So = StockPrices' SP = stockspec(Sigma, So); PriceBLS(idx) = optstockbybls(RateSpec, SP, Settle, ExerciseDates,... OptSpec, Strike); PriceKV(idx) = asianbykv(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); PriceLevy(idx) = asianbylevy(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); PriceKV(idx) = asianbykv(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); PriceKV(idx) = asianbykv(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates); idx = idx+1; end figure('menubar', 'none', 'numbertitle', 'off') plot(StockPrices, [PriceBLS PriceKV PriceLevy PriceTW PriceHHM]); xlabel 'Spot Price (\$)' ylabel 'Option Price (\$)' title 'Call Price Comparison' legend('Vanilla', 'Geometric Asian', 'Continuous Arithmetic Asian (1)', 'Continuous Arithmetic Asian (2)', 'Discrete Arithmetic Asian', 'location', 'northwest');```

It can be observed that the price of the Asian option is cheaper than the price of the Vanilla option.

Also, it is possible to observe the effect of changes in the volatility of the underlying asset. The table below shows what happens to Asian and Vanilla option prices when the constant volatility changes.

` Call Option (ITM)`

` Strike = 90 AssetPrice = 100 `

` -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------`

` Volatility Haug-Haug-Margrabe Turnbull-Wakeman Levy Kemna-Vorst BLS`

` 10% 11.3946 11.3987 11.3987 11.3121 13.4343`

` 20% 12.1087 12.1647 12.1647 11.8626 15.7438`

` 30% 13.5374 13.6512 13.6512 13.0338 18.8770`

` 40% 15.2823 15.4464 15.4464 14.4086 22.2507`

A comparison of the calculated prices show that Asian options are less sensitive to volatility changes, since averaging reduces the volatility of the value of the underlying asset. Also, Asian options that use arithmetic average are more expensive than those that use geometric average.

Now, examine the effect of strike on option prices.

```Strikes = (90:5:120)'; NStrike = length(Strikes); PriceBLS = nan(size(Strikes)); PriceKV = nan(size(Strikes)); PriceLevy = nan(size(Strikes)); PriceTW = nan(size(Strikes)); PriceHHM = nan(size(Strikes)); idx = 1; for ST = Strikes' SP = stockspec(Sigma, AssetPrice); PriceBLS(idx) = optstockbybls(RateSpec, SP, Settle, ExerciseDates,... OptSpec, ST); PriceKV(idx) = asianbykv(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, ST, Settle,... ExerciseDates); PriceLevy(idx) = asianbylevy(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, ST, Settle,... ExerciseDates); PriceTW(idx) = asianbytw(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, ST, Settle,... ExerciseDates); PriceHHM(idx) = asianbyhhm(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, ST, Settle,... ExerciseDates); idx = idx+1; end figure('menubar', 'none', 'numbertitle', 'off') plot(Strikes, [PriceBLS PriceKV PriceLevy PriceTW PriceHHM]); xlabel 'Strike Price (\$)' ylabel 'Option Price (\$)' title 'Effect of Strike on Option Prices' legend('Vanilla', 'Geometric Asian', 'Continuous Arithmetic Asian (1)', 'Continuous Arithmetic Asian (2)', 'Discrete Arithmetic Asian', 'location', 'northeast');```

The figure above displays the option price with respect to strike price. Since call option value decreases as strike price increases, the Asian call curve is under the Vanilla call curve. It can be observed that the Asian call option is less expensive than the Vanilla call.

### Hedging

Hedging is an insurance to minimize exposure to market movements on the value of a position or portfolio. As the underlying changes, the proportions of the instruments forming the portfolio may need to be adjusted to keep the sensitivities within the desired range. `Delta` measures the option price sensitivity to changes in the price of the underlying.

Assume that you have a portfolio of two options with the same strike and maturity. You can use the Financial Instruments Toolbox™ to compute `Delta` for the Vanilla and Average Price options.

```OutSpec = 'Delta'; % Vanilla option using Black Scholes DeltaBLS = optstocksensbybls(RateSpec, StockSpec, Settle, ExerciseDates,... OptSpec, Strike, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); % Asian option using Kemna-Vorst method DeltaKV = asiansensbykv(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); % Asian option using Levy model DeltaLevy = asiansensbylevy(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); % Asian option using Turnbull-Wakeman model DeltaTW = asiansensbytw(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); % Asian option using Haug-Haug-Margrabe model DeltaHHM = asiansensbyhhm(RateSpec, StockSpec, OptSpec, Strike, Settle,... ExerciseDates, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); % Delta Comparison displayComparisonVanillaAsian('Delta', DeltaBLS, DeltaKV, DeltaLevy, DeltaTW, DeltaHHM)```
```Comparison of Vanilla and Asian Delta: Vanilla BLS: 0.788666 Asian Kemna-Vorst: 0.844986 Asian Levy: 0.852806 Asian Turnbull-Wakeman: 0.852806 Asian Haug-Haug-Margrabe: 0.857864 ```

The following graph demonstrates the behavior of `Delta` for the Vanilla and Asian options as a function of the underlying price.

```StockPrices = (40:5:120)'; NStockPrices = length(StockPrices); DeltaBLS = nan(size(StockPrices)); DeltaKV = nan(size(StockPrices)); DeltaLevy = nan(size(StockPrices)); DeltaTW = nan(size(StockPrices)); DeltaHHM = nan(size(StockPrices)); idx = 1; for SPrices = StockPrices' SP = stockspec(Sigma, SPrices); DeltaBLS(idx) = optstocksensbybls(RateSpec, SP, Settle, ... ExerciseDates, OptSpec, Strike, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); DeltaKV(idx) = asiansensbykv(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, ... Settle, ExerciseDates,'OutSpec', OutSpec); DeltaLevy(idx) = asiansensbylevy(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike,... Settle, ExerciseDates, 'OutSpec', OutSpec); DeltaTW(idx) = asiansensbytw(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, ... Settle, ExerciseDates,'OutSpec', OutSpec); DeltaHHM(idx) = asiansensbyhhm(RateSpec, SP, OptSpec, Strike, ... Settle, ExerciseDates,'OutSpec', OutSpec); idx = idx+1; end figure('menubar', 'none', 'numbertitle', 'off') plot(StockPrices, [DeltaBLS DeltaKV DeltaLevy DeltaTW DeltaHHM]); xlabel 'Spot Price (\$)' ylabel 'Call Delta' title 'Delta Comparison (Strike Price = \$90)' legend('Vanilla', 'Geometric Asian', 'Continuous Arithmetic Asian (1)', 'Continuous Arithmetic Asian (2)', 'Discrete Arithmetic Asian', 'location', 'northwest');```

A Vanilla, or Asian, in the money (ITM) call option is more sensitive to price movements than an out of the money (OTM) option. If the asset price is deep in the money, then it is more likely to be exercised. The opposite occurs for an out of the money option. Asian delta is lower for out of the money options and is higher for in the money options than its Vanilla European counterpart. The geometric Asian delta is lower than the arithmetic Asian delta.

### References

[1] Kemna, A. and Vorst, A. "A Pricing Method for Options Based on Average Asset Values." Journal of Banking and Finance. Vol. 14, 1990, pp. 113-129.

[2] Levy, E. "Pricing European Average Rate Currency Options." Journal of International Money and Finance. Vol. 11,1992, pp. 474-491.

[3] Turnbull, S. M., and Wakeman, L.M. "A Quick Algorithm for Pricing European Average Options." Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 26(3), 1991, pp. 377-389.

[4] Haug, E. G. The Complete Guide to Option Pricing Formulas. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2007.

### Utility Functions

```function displayPricesClosedForm(PriceKV, PriceLevy, PriceTW, PriceHHM) fprintf('Comparison of Asian Arithmetic and Geometric Prices:\n'); fprintf('\n'); fprintf('Kemna-Vorst: %f\n', PriceKV); fprintf('Levy: %f\n', PriceLevy); fprintf('Turnbull-Wakeman: %f\n', PriceTW); fprintf('Haug-Haug-Margrabe: %f\n', PriceHHM); end function displayPricesCRR(PriceCRR20, PriceCRR40) fprintf('Asian Prices using the CRR lattice model:\n'); fprintf('\n'); fprintf('PriceArithmetic(CRR20): %f\n', PriceCRR20(1)); fprintf('PriceArithmetic(CRR40): %f\n', PriceCRR40(1)); fprintf('PriceGeometric (CRR20): %f\n', PriceCRR20(2)); fprintf('PriceGeometric (CRR40): %f\n', PriceCRR40(2)); end function displayPricesMonteCarlo(PriceAMC, PriceAMCAntithetic, PriceGMC, PriceGMCAntithetic) fprintf('Asian Prices using Monte Carlo Method:\n'); fprintf('\n'); fprintf('Arithmetic Asian\n'); fprintf('Standard Monte Carlo: %f\n', PriceAMC); fprintf('Variate Antithetic Monte Carlo: %f\n\n', PriceAMCAntithetic); fprintf('Geometric Asian\n'); fprintf('Standard Monte Carlo: %f\n', PriceGMC); fprintf('Variate Antithetic Monte Carlo: %f\n', PriceGMCAntithetic); end function displayComparisonAsianCallPrices(PriceLevy, PriceTW, PriceHHM, PriceCRR40, PriceAMCAntithetic, PriceAMCAntithetic2000, PriceKV, PriceGMCAntithetic, PriceGMCAntithetic2000) fprintf('Comparison of Asian call prices:\n'); fprintf('\n'); fprintf('Arithmetic Asian\n'); fprintf('Levy: %f\n', PriceLevy); fprintf('Turnbull-Wakeman: %f\n', PriceTW); fprintf('Haug-Haug-Margrabe: %f\n', PriceHHM); fprintf('Cox-Ross-Rubinstein: %f\n', PriceCRR40(1)); fprintf('Monte Carlo(500 trials): %f\n', PriceAMCAntithetic); fprintf('Monte Carlo(2000 trials): %f\n', PriceAMCAntithetic2000); fprintf('\n'); fprintf('Geometric Asian\n'); fprintf('Kemna-Vorst: %f\n', PriceKV); fprintf('Cox-Ross-Rubinstein: %f\n', PriceCRR40(2)); fprintf('Monte Carlo(500 trials): %f\n', PriceGMCAntithetic); fprintf('Monte Carlo(2000 trials): %f\n', PriceGMCAntithetic2000); end function displayComparisonVanillaAsian(type, BLS, KV, Levy, TW, HHM) fprintf('Comparison of Vanilla and Asian %s:\n', type); fprintf('\n'); fprintf('Vanilla BLS: %f\n', BLS); fprintf('Asian Kemna-Vorst: %f\n', KV); fprintf('Asian Levy: %f\n', Levy); fprintf('Asian Turnbull-Wakeman: %f\n', TW); fprintf('Asian Haug-Haug-Margrabe: %f\n', HHM); end```