Undecidable MISRA C:2012 Rules and Directives Supported by Polyspace Bug Finder
The MISRA C:2012 standard classifies rules and directives that cannot be statically enforced in every possible cases as Undecidable. Polyspace® supports 44 out of 51 such rules, and 18 out of 21 such directives.
Undecidable Rules
A rule is undecidable if a static analysis tool can check compliance to it only in certain cases. Polyspace shows the subset of all possible issues. For details about which issues Polyspace detects for a particular rule, see the Polyspace Implementation section in the reference page of the rule. Polyspace supports 44 out of 51 such rules.
| MISRA C:2012 Rule | Description | Polyspace Checker | 
|---|---|---|
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 12.2 | The right hand operand of a shift operator shall lie in the range zero to one less than the width in bits of the essential type of the left hand operand | MISRA C:2012 Rule 12.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1 | Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects | MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.2 | The value of an expression and its persistent side effects shall be the same under all permitted evaluation orders and shall be independent from thread interleaving | MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.5 | The right hand operand of a logical && or || operator shall not contain persistent side effects | MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.5 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 14.1 | A loop counter shall not have essentially floating type | MISRA C:2012 Rule 14.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 14.2 | A for loop shall be well-formed | MISRA C:2012 Rule 14.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 14.3 | Controlling expressions shall not be invariant | MISRA C:2012 Rule 14.3 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.11 | A function that never returns should be declared with a _Noreturnfunction specifier | MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.11 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.2 | Functions shall not call themselves, either directly or indirectly | MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.5 | The function argument corresponding to a parameter declared to have an array type shall have an appropriate number of elements | MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.5 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.8 | A function parameter should not be modified | MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.8 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.9 | A function declared with a _Noreturnfunction specifier shall
         not return to its caller | MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.9 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.1 | A pointer resulting from arithmetic on a pointer operand shall address an element of the same array as that pointer operand | MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.2 | Subtraction between pointers shall only be applied to pointers that address elements of the same array | MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.3 | The relational operators >, >=, < and <= shall not be applied to expressions of pointer type except where they point into the same object | MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.3 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.6 | The address of an object with automatic or thread-local storage shall not be copied to another object that persists after the first object has ceased to exist | MISRA C:2012 Rule 18.6 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 19.1 | An object shall not be assigned or copied to an overlapping object | MISRA C:2012 Rule 19.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 1.2 | Language extensions should not be used | MISRA C:2012 Rule 1.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 1.3 | There shall be no occurrence of undefined or critical unspecified behaviour | MISRA C:2012 Rule 1.3 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 1.5 | Obsolescent language features shall not be used | MISRA C:2012 Rule 1.5 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.13 | Any value passed to a function in <ctype.h>shall be
			representable as anunsigned charor be the value EOF | MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.13 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.14 | The Standard Library function memcmpshall not be used to
			compare null terminated strings | MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.14 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.17 | Use of the string handling function from <string.h>shall not result in accesses beyond the bounds of the objects referenced by their
			pointer parameters | MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.17 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.18 | The size_targument passed to any function in<string.h>shall have an appropriate value | MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.18 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.19 | The pointers returned by the Standard Library functions localeconv,getenv,setlocaleorstrerrorshall only be used as if
			they have pointer toconst-qualified type | MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.19 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.20 | The pointer returned by the Standard Library functions asctime,ctime,gmtime,localtime,localeconv,getenv,setlocaleorstrerrorshall not be used following a subsequent call to the
			same function | MISRA C:2012 Rule 21.20 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.1 | All resources obtained dynamically by means of Standard Library functions shall be explicitly released | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.10 | The value of errnoshall only be tested when the last
			function to be called was anerrno-setting function | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.10 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.11 | A thread that was previously either joined or detached shall not be subsequently joined nor detached | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.11 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.15 | Thread synchronization objects and thread-specific storage pointers shall not be destroyed until after all threads accessing them have terminated | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.15 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.16 | All mutex objects locked by a thread shall be explicitly unlocked by the same thread | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.16 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.17 | No thread shall unlock a mutex or call cnd_wait()orcnd_timedwait()for a mutex it has not locked before | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.17 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.2 | A block of memory shall only be freed if it was allocated by means of a Standard Library function | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.3 | The same file shall not be open for read and write access at the same time on different streams | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.3 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.4 | There shall be no attempt to write to a stream which has been opened as read-only | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.4 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.5 | A pointer to a FILEobject shall not
be dereferenced | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.5 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.6 | The value of a pointer to a FILEshall not be used after the
            associated stream has been closed | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.6 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.7 | The macro EOFshall only be compared with the unmodified return
			value from any Standard Library function capable of returningEOF | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.7 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.8 | The value of errnoshall be set to zero prior to a call to anerrno-setting-function | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.8 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.9 | The value of errnoshall be tested against zero after calling anerrno-setting function | MISRA C:2012 Rule 22.9 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.1 | A project shall not contain unreachable code | MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.2 | A project shall not contain dead code | MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.2 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.13 | A pointer should point to a const-qualified type whenever possible | MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.13 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Rule 9.1 | The value of an object with automatic storage duration shall not be read before it has been set | MISRA C:2012 Rule 9.1 | 
Undecidable Directives
A directive is undecidable if a static analysis tool can check compliance to it only in certain cases. Polyspace shows the subset of all possible issues. For details about which issues Polyspace detects for a particular directive, see the Polyspace Implementation section in the reference page of the directive. Polyspace supports 18 out of 21 such directives.
| MISRA C:2012 Directives | Description | Polyspace Checker | 
|---|---|---|
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 1.1 | Any implementation-defined behavior on which the output of the program depends shall be documented and understood | MISRA C:2012 Dir 1.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 2.1 | All source files shall compile without any compilation errors | MISRA C:2012 Dir 2.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.1 | Run-time failures shall be minimized | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.10 | Precautions shall be taken in order to prevent the contents of a header file being included more than once | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.10 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.11 | The validity of values passed to library functions shall be checked | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.11 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.12 | Dynamic memory allocation shall not be used | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.12 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.13 | Functions which are designed to provide operations on a resource should be called in an appropriate sequence | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.13 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.14 | The validity of values received from external sources shall be checked | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.14 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.15 | Evaluation of floating-point expressions shall not lead to the undetected generation of infinities and NaNs | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.15 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.3 | Assembly language shall be encapsulated and isolated | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.3 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.4 | Sections of code should not be "commented out" | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.4 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.5 | Identifiers in the same name space with overlapping visibility should be typographically unambiguous | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.5 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.6 | typedefsthat indicate size and signedness
should be used in place of the basic numerical types | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.6 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.7 | If a function returns error information, then that error information shall be tested | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.7 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.8 | If a pointer to a structure or union is never dereferenced within a translation unit, then the implementation of the object should be hidden | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.8 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.9 | A function should be used in preference to a function-like macro where they are interchangeable | MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.9 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 5.1 | There shall be no data races between threads | MISRA C:2012 Dir 5.1 | 
| MISRA C:2012 Dir 5.2 | There shall be no deadlocks between threads | MISRA C:2012 Dir 5.2 |