Main Content

This example shows how to model antenna, transmitter, and receiver gains and losses for a detailed radar range equation analysis. We start by computing the available signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the radar receiver using the SNR form of the radar equation. Next, the detectability factor is defined as a threshold SNR required to make a detection with specified probabilities of detection, $${P}_{d}$$, and false alarm, $${P}_{fa}$$. The maximum range of the system is then estimated as the range at which the available SNR is equal to the detectability factor i.e. the maximum range at which the detection with the specified $${P}_{d}$$ and $${P}_{fa}$$ is still possible. The example further explores the impact of losses introduced by different components of the radar system on the estimated maximum range. We first consider the effects of the sensitivity time control (STC) and eclipsing on the available SNR. Scanning and signal processing losses that require an increase in the radar detectability factor are considered next. The example concludes by computing the resulting $${P}_{d}$$ at the detector output to demonstrate the impact of the losses on the detection performance of the radar system.

The radar equation combines the main parameters of a radar system and allows a radar engineer to compute a maximum detection range, a required peak transmit power, or a maximum available SNR for a radar system. The radar equation is typically a family of three relatively simple formulas each corresponding to one of these key performance characteristics. A common form of the radar equation for computing the maximum available SNR at a range $$R$$ is:

$$SNR=\frac{{P}_{t}\tau {G}_{t}{G}_{r}{\lambda}^{2}\sigma}{(4\pi {)}^{3}k{T}_{s}{R}^{4}L}$$

where

$${P}_{t}$$ is the peak transmit power

$$\tau $$ is the transmitted pulse width

$${G}_{t}$$ is the transmit antenna gain

$${G}_{r}$$ is the receive antenna gain

$$\lambda $$ is the radar wavelength

$$\sigma $$ is the radar target cross section (RCS)

$$k$$ is Boltzmann's constant

$${T}_{s}$$ is the system noise temperature

$$L$$ is the general loss factor that combines losses along the transmitter-target-receiver path that reduce the received signal energy.

On the right-hand side all parameters except the target range and RCS are under control of the radar designer. This equation states that for a target of a given size located at a range $$R$$, the SNR available at the receiver can be increased by transmitting more power, increasing the antenna size, using lower frequency, or having a more sensitive receiver.

Let's consider an S-band airport surveillance radar operating at the frequency of 3 GHz. The peak transmit power is 0.2 MW, the transmit and receive antenna gain is 34 dB, the pulse duration is 11 $\mu $s, and the noise figure is 4.1 dB. Assume the radar is required to detect a target with 1 m$${}^{2}$$ RCS at the maximum range $${R}_{m}$$ of 100 km.

lambda = freq2wavelen(3e9); % Wavelength (m) Pt = 0.2e6; % Peak power (W) tau = 1.1e-5; % Pulse width (s) G = 34; % Transmit and receive antenna gain (dB) Ts = systemp(4.1); % System temperature (K) rcs = 1; % Target radar cross section (m^2) Rm = 100e3; % Required maximum range (m)

To start, let's assume no losses, i.e. $$L$$ = 0 dB. We use the radar equation to compute the available SNR at the receiver as a function of target range

L = 0; % Combined transmission line and propagation losses (dB) R = (1:40:130e3).'; % Range samples (m) SNR = radareqsnr(lambda,R,Pt,tau,'Gain',G,'Ts',Ts,'RCS',rcs,'Loss',L);

At the required maximum range of 100 km the available SNR is

SNRatRm = SNR(find(R>=Rm,1))

SNRatRm = 18.3169

Computed available SNR and the maximum range requirement can be plotted together

radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNR,'MetricName','Available SNR','MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3,'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB'); legend('Location','best');

The calculation and the plot show that for a target with 1 m$${}^{2}$$ RCS at the range of 100 km, the available SNR at the receiver is approximately 18.32 dB.

Is the available SNR of 18.32 dB enough to make a detection? Since the signal processed by a radar receiver is a combination of the transmitted waveform and the random noise, the answer to this question depends on the desired probability of detection, $${P}_{d}$$, and the maximum acceptable probability of false alarm, $${P}_{fa}$$. These probabilities define the required SNR, also known as the detectability factor (or detectability). The detectability factor is the minimum SNR required to declare a detection with the specified probabilities of detection and false alarm. It also depends on the RCS fluctuation and the type of the detector. Assuming $${P}_{d}$$ = 0.9 and $${P}_{fa}$$ = 1e-6, the detectability factor for a single pulse received from a steady (Swerling 0) target by a square-law detector is

```
Pd = 0.9;
Pfa = 1e-6;
D0 = detectability(Pd,Pfa,1,'Swerling0')
```

D0 = 13.1217

while for a Swerling 1 fluctuating target, which is a more accurate model for real-world targets, the single-pulse detectability factor is significantly higher

`D1 = detectability(Pd,Pfa,1,'Swerling1')`

D1 = 21.1436

The resultant required SNR of 21.14 dB is higher than the available SNR of 18.32 dB, which means that a Swerling 1 target will not be detected with a single pulse. A common way to lower the detectability factor is to perform pulse integration. For $$N$$ = 10 noncoherently integrated pulses the detectability factor is

```
N = 10;
DN = detectability(Pd,Pfa,N,'Swerling1')
```

DN = 13.5033

which is lower than the available SNR. Thus, after a non-coherent integration of 10 pulses the radar system will be able to detect a 1 m$${}^{2}$$ target at the required maximum range of 100 km with the probability of detection 0.9 and a false alarm of 1e-6.

The detectability factor computed for a Swerling 1 target and $$N$$ pulses combines the effects of the integration gain and the fluctuation loss. The integration gain is a difference between the SNR required to detect a steady target using a single pulse and the SNR required to detect a steady target using $$N$$ pulses

Gi = detectability(Pd,Pfa,1,'Swerling0') - detectability(Pd,Pfa,N,'Swerling0')

Gi = 7.7881

The fluctuation loss is a difference between the SNR required to detect a fluctuating target and the SNR required to detect a steady target

Lf = detectability(Pd,Pfa,N,'Swerling1') - detectability(Pd,Pfa,N,'Swerling0')

Lf = 8.1696

A waterfall chart can be used to illustrate the components of the detectability factor

helperDetectabilityWaterfallPlot([D0 -Gi Lf], {'Single-pulse steady target','Pulse integration gain','Fluctuation loss'});

Once the detectability factor has been computed, it can be substituted into the range form of the radar equation as the minimum required SNR to evaluate the actual maximum range of the system

radareqrng(lambda,DN,Pt,tau,'Gain',G,'Ts',Ts,'RCS',rcs,'Loss',L,'unitstr','km')

ans = 131.9308

To clearly indicate at which ranges the detection with the specified desired $${P}_{d}$$ and the maximum acceptable $${P}_{fa}$$ is possible, we add the computed detectability factor as a horizontal line to the SNR vs Range plot. We also use a stoplight chart to color code ranges and SNR levels according to the computed detectability. At the ranges where the available SNR curve passes through the green zone the radar meets the detection requirement, while at the range where it is in the red zone the detection with the specified $${P}_{d}$$ and $${P}_{fa}$$ is not possible.

radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNR,DN, ... 'MetricName','Available SNR', ... 'RequirementName','Detectability', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); title([{'Available SNR vs Range'}, {'(No Losses)'}]); legend('Location','best');

Notice that all ranges beyond the required maximum range are colored green and marked as Pass.

The above analysis assumes zero losses and therefore cannot adequately predict the range of the actual radar system. A real radar system with the specified parameters will have a shorter maximum range due to

Propagation effects caused by the earth's surface and atmosphere. These effects reduce the amount of available signal energy at the receiver.

Various losses experienced throughout the radar system. Some losses in this category reduce the available SNR, while other losses result in increased detectability factor.

The following sections consider in more details the impact of the losses that belong to the second category on the range performance of the radar system.

When designing a surveillance radar system, several factors must be included in the radar equation to account for the decrease in the available signal energy at the receiver.

Pulse radar systems turn off their receivers during the pulse transmission. Thus, the target echoes arriving from the ranges within one pulse length from the radar or within one pulse length around the unambiguous range will be eclipsed by the transmitted pulse resulting in only a fraction of the pulse being received and processed. The radar system considered in this example has a pulse width of 11$$\mu s$$. The closest range from which a full pulse can be received is the minimum range $${R}_{min}$$

Rmin = time2range(tau)

Rmin = 1.6489e+03

The echoes from the targets that are closer than 1649 m will arrive before the pulse transmission has been completed. Similar effect happens to the targets located at or near the multiples of the unambiguous range. Assuming the pulse repetition frequency is 1350 Hz (pulse repetition interval $$T\approx $$0.75 ms), the unambiguous range of the system is

```
prf = 1350; % Pulse repetition frequency
Rua = time2range(1/prf)
```

Rua = 1.1103e+05

The echoes arriving from the ranges $${R}_{ua}\pm {R}_{min}$$will be eclipsed by the next transmitted pulse. The diagram below illustrates pulse eclipsing. The arrowheads indicate the front of the pulse.

Due to eclipsing, the available SNR will have deep notches at 0 range and the ranges equal to the multiples of $${R}_{ua}$$. The eclipsing factor must be added to the radar equation in order to account for the loss in the available SNR due to pulse eclipsing

Du = tau*prf; % Duty cycle Fecl = eclipsingfactor(R,Du,prf); % Eclipsing factor SNR = radareqsnr(lambda,R,Pt,tau,'Gain',G,'Ts',Ts,'RCS',rcs,'CustomFactor',Fecl,'Loss', L); radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNR,DN, ... 'MetricName','Available SNR', ... 'RequirementName','Detectability', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); title([{'Available SNR vs Range'}, {'(With Eclipsing)'}]); legend('Location','best');

The real-world radar systems utilize PRF diversity in order to prevent the eclipsing loss and to extend the unambiguous range of the system.

A typical surveillance radar system must transmit a considerable amount of power to detect targets at long ranges. Although the available energy rapidly decays with range, at very close ranges even small targets can have very strong returns due to high peak transmit power. Such strong returns from small nuisance targets (birds, insects) might result in undesirable detections while the regular size targets or nearby clutter can saturate the receiver. It is highly desirable for the surveillance radar system to avoid these kind of nuisance detections. To solve this problem the radar systems use STC. It scales the receiver gain up to a cut-off range $${R}_{stc}$$ to maintain a constant signal strength as a target approaches the radar.

Rstc = 60e3; % STC cut-off range (m) Xstc = 4; % STC exponent selected to maintain target detectability at ranges below Rstc (since the signal power is inversely proportional to R^4) Fstc = stcfactor(R,Rstc,Xstc); % STC factor SNR = radareqsnr(lambda,R,Pt,tau,'Gain',G,'Ts',Ts,'RCS',rcs,'CustomFactor',Fecl+Fstc,'Loss',L); radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNR,DN, ... 'MetricName','Available SNR', ... 'RequirementName','Detectability', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); title([{'Available SNR vs Range'}, {'(With STC and Eclipsing for 1 m^2 Target)'}]); legend('Location','best'); ylim([-30 30])

After adding the STC factor, the plot shows that the 1 m$${}^{2}$$ RCS target is still detected everywhere up to the maximum range $${R}_{m}$$, while a small target with RCS of 0.03 m$${}^{2}$$ will not be able to reach the required $${P}_{d}$$ of 0.9 at any range and thus will be rejected

SNRsmallRCS = radareqsnr(lambda,R,Pt,tau,'Gain',G,'Ts',Ts,'RCS',0.03,'CustomFactor',Fecl+Fstc,'Loss',L); radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNRsmallRCS,DN, ... 'MetricName','Available SNR', ... 'RequirementName','Detectability', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); title([{'Available SNR vs Range'}, {'(With STC and Eclipsing for 0.03 m^2 Target)'}]); legend('Location','best'); ylim([-30 20])

From the above plots it is clear that the STC only scales the available SNR up to the specified cut-off range and does not affect the available SNR at the maximum range of interest.

A radar system can scan a search volume either by mechanically rotating the antenna or by using the phased array antenna and performing electronic scanning. An imperfect shape of the antenna beam and the process of sweeping the beam across a search volume introduces additional losses to the system.

The radar equation uses a peak value of the antenna gain assuming each received pulse has the maximum amplitude. In reality, as the beam passes the target, the received pulses are modulated by the two-way pattern of the scanning antenna resulting in beam shape loss. Computing the exact value of this loss would require knowing the exact antenna pattern. This information might not be available at the early stages of the radar system design when this type of analysis is usually performed. Instead, the shape of the main lobe of a typical practical antenna can be well approximated by a Gaussian shape. Assuming that the radar system performs dense sampling in the spatial domain (i.e. the beam moves by less than 0.71 of the half power beamwidth), the beam shape loss for one dimensional scanning is

Lb = beamloss

Lb = 1.2338

and it is doubled if the radar system scans in both azimuth and elevation

beamloss(true)

ans = 2.4677

In this example we assume the radar system employs an electronically steered phased array to perform scanning. Using the phased array antenna will cause an increase in the required SNR due to two effects: 1) beam broadening due to the reduced projected array area in the beam direction, and 2) reduction of the effective aperture area of the individual array elements at off-broadside angles. To account for these effects the scan sector loss must be added to the detectability factor. Let's assume that the system in the example scans only in the azimuth dimension and the scan sector spans from -60 to 60 degrees, the resultant loss is

```
theta = [-60 60];
Larray = arrayscanloss(Pd,Pfa,N,theta,'Swerling1')
```

Larray = 2.7745

Prior to detection the received radar echoes must pass through the radar signal processing chain. The purpose of different components in the signal processing chain is to guarantee the required probabilities of detection and false alarm, reject unwanted echoes from clutter, and account for variable or non-Gaussian noise. We further consider several components of the signal processing loss that must be accounted for in a surveillance radar system.

Moving target indicator (MTI) is a process of rejecting fixed or slowly moving clutter while passing echoes from targets moving with significant velocities. Typical MTI uses 2, 3, or 4-pulse canceller that implements a high-pass filter to reject echoes with low Doppler shifts. Passing the received signal through the MTI pulse canceller introduces correlation between the noise samples. This in turn reduces the total number of independent noise samples available for integration resulting in MTI noise correlation loss. Additionally, the MTI canceller significantly suppresses targets with velocities close to the nulls of its frequency response causing an additional MTI velocity response loss. Assuming a 2-pulse canceller is used, these two components of the MTI loss are

```
m = 2;
[Lmti_a, Lmti_b] = mtiloss(Pd,Pfa,N,m,'Swerling1')
```

Lmti_a = 1.4468

Lmti_b = 8.1562

In a system that uses a single PRF, the MTI velocity response loss can be very high for the high required probability of detection. To eliminate this loss, PRF diversity is almost always used in real radar systems.

Binary integration is a suboptimal noncoherent integration technique also known as the M-of-N integration. If $$M$$ out of $$N$$ received pulses exceed a predetermined threshold, a target is declared to be present. The binary integrator is a relatively simple automatic detector and is less sensitive to the effects of a single large interference pulse that might exist along with the target echoes. Therefore, the binary integrator is more robust when the background noise or clutter is non-Gaussian. Since the binary integration is a suboptimal technique it results in a binary integration loss compared to optimal noncoherent integration. The optimal value of $$M$$ is not a sensitive selection and it can be quite different from the optimum without significant penalty resulting in the binary integration loss being lower than 1.4 dB. When $$N$$ is 10 and $$M$$ is set to 6, the binary integration loss is

M = 6; Lbint = binaryintloss(Pd,Pfa,N,M)

Lbint = 1.0549

The `binaryintloss`

function computes the loss assuming a steady (Swerling 0) target. Since the fluctuation loss is included in the detectability factor, the same binary integration loss computation can be used in the case of a fluctuating target.

Constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector is used to maintain an approximately constant rate of false target detections when the noise or the interference levels vary. Since CFAR averages a finite number of reference cells to estimate the noise level, the estimates are subject to an error which leads to a CFAR loss. CFAR loss is an increase in the SNR required to achieve a desired detection performance using CFAR when the noise levels are unknown compared to a fixed threshold with a known noise level. Assuming 120 total cells are used for cell-averaging CFAR, the CFAR loss is

Nrc = 120; Lcfar = cfarloss(Pfa,Nrc)

Lcfar = 0.2500

The scanning and the signal processing losses increase the detectability factor which means that more energy is required to make a detection. The resulting detectability factor that includes effects of all these losses is called the effective detectability factor. The waterfall chart shows the combined effect of the computed scanning and signal processing losses on the detectability factor

D = [D0 -Gi Lf Lmti_a+Lmti_b Lbint Lcfar Larray Lb]; helperDetectabilityWaterfallPlot(D, {'Single-pulse steady target','Pulse integration gain','Fluctuation loss'... 'MTI loss', 'Binary integration loss', 'CFAR loss', 'Scan sector loss', 'Beam shape loss'});

The resulting effective detectability factor equals 28.42 dB. By taking the scanning and the signal processing losses into account, the required SNR increases by almost 15 dB. The analysis shows that the system cannot actually meet the stated requirement of detecting a 1 m$${}^{2}$$ RCS target at 100 km with $${P}_{d}$$ = 0.9 and $${P}_{fa}$$ = 1e-6.

radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNR,sum(D), ... 'MetricName', ... 'Available SNR', ... 'RequirementName','Detectability', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); title([{'Available SNR vs Range'}, {'(With STC, Eclipsing, Scanning and Signal Processing Losses)'}]) legend('Location','best') ylim([-10 30]);

This problem can be addressed either by increasing the available SNR or decreasing the required SNR. Transmitting more power or increasing the antenna gains brings up the available SNR, while increasing the integration time lowers the required SNR. However, in some applications, a subset of the system parameters can be constrained by other requirements and thus cannot be changed. For example, if the analysis is performed for an existing system, increasing the available SNR might not be an option. In that case, making adjustments to the signal processing chain to lower the detectability factor could be an acceptable solution. To lower the required SNR, in the following sections we assume that the number of pulses, $$N$$, is increased from 10 to 40.

In addition, we can change the requirements on the maximum range and the detection probabilities. Instead of a single number specifying the desired probability of detection or the maximum range, a pair of `Objective`

and `Threshold`

values can be defined. The `Objective`

requirement describes the desired performance level of the system that would be needed to fully satisfy the mission needs. The `Threshold`

requirement describes a minimum acceptable performance level of the system. Using a pair of values to define a requirement instead of a single value provides more flexibility to the design and creates a trade-space for selecting the system parameters. In this example we assume that the `Objective`

requirement for $${P}_{d}$$ is 0.9 and set the `Threshold`

value to 0.8. Similarly, the `Objective`

maximum range requirement remains 100 km, while the `Threshold`

value is set to 90 km. The detectability factor is now computed both for the `Objective`

and the `Threshold`

$${P}_{d}$$.

N = 40; M = 18; Pd = [0.9 0.8]; [Lmti_a, Lmti_b] = mtiloss(Pd,Pfa,N,m,'Swerling1'); Dx = detectability(Pd,Pfa,N,'Swerling1') + cfarloss(Pfa,Nrc) + beamloss ... + Lmti_a + Lmti_b + binaryintloss(Pd,Pfa,N,M) + arrayscanloss(Pd,Pfa,N,theta,'Swerling1')

`Dx = `*2×1*
24.2522
18.0494

Rm = [100e3 90e3]; radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,SNR,Dx(1),Dx(2), ... 'MetricName', ... 'Available SNR', ... 'RequirementName','Detectability', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km','MetricUnit','dB', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); title([{'Available SNR vs Range'}, {'(N=40)'}]) legend('Location','best') ylim([-10 30]);

The SNR vs Range plot now has a yellow Warn zone indicating the SNR values and target ranges where system's performance would be between the `Objective`

and the `Threshold`

requirements. We can see that up to approximately 70 km the system meets the `Objective`

requirement for $${P}_{d}$$. From 70 km to 100 km the `Objective`

requirement for $${P}_{d}$$ is violated while the `Threshold`

requirement is still satisfied.

The SNR vs Range plot above shows that the radar system's detection performance varies with range. A 1 m$${}^{2}$$ target at ranges below 70 km will be detected with the probability of detection greater or equal to 0.9, while between 70 km and 100 km it will be detected with $${P}_{d}$$ of at least 0.8. Since some of the considered losses depend on the probability of detection, the actual $${P}_{d}$$ at the detector output varies with range. We can use the ROC curve to compute $${P}_{d}$$ as a function of range

% Generate a vector of probability values at which to compute the ROC curve p = probgrid(0.1,0.9999,100); % Compute the required SNR at these probabilities [lmti_a, lmti_b] = mtiloss(p,Pfa,N,m,'Swerling1'); dx = detectability(p,Pfa,N,'Swerling1') + cfarloss(Pfa,Nrc) + beamloss ... + lmti_a + lmti_b + binaryintloss(p,Pfa,N,M) + arrayscanloss(p,Pfa,N,theta,'Swerling1'); % Plot the ROC curve helperRadarPdVsSNRPlot(dx,p,[0.1 0.9999]);

The effective probability of detection at the detector output can now be computed by interpolating this ROC curve at the available SNR values

% Interpolate the ROC curve at the available SNR Pdeff = rocinterp(dx,p,SNR,'snr-pd'); % Plot the effective Pd as a function of range radarmetricplot(R*1e-3,Pdeff,Pd(1),Pd(2), ... 'MetricName','Effective P_d', ... 'RequirementName','P_d', ... 'MaxRangeRequirement',Rm*1e-3, ... 'RangeUnit','km', ... 'ShowStoplight',true); legend('Location','best') ylim([0.5 1.0])

This result shows that due to application of the STC the probability of detection is almost constant for ranges from 2 km to 60 km. For a target with 1 m$${}^{2}$$ RCS it is higher than 0.92. In the range between 70 km and 87 km the effective $${P}_{d}$$ is above 0.85. At the `Threshold`

value of the maximum range requirement the probability of detection is approximately 0.84, and at the `Objective`

range of 100 km it is slightly above 0.8.

This example demonstrates how various losses impact the detection performance of a radar system. It starts with a radar equation and introduces the concepts of the available SNR and the detectability factor. For an example surveillance radar system it shows how the available SNR is reduced by STC and eclipsing, while the detectability factor is increased by scanning and signal processing losses. Finally, the example demonstrates how to compute the effective probability of detection at the receiver output for different target ranges.