Inverse stationary wavelet transform (iswt) slow compared to stationary wavelet transform?
Show older comments
I ran an analysis of my code using profile, and found that iswt takes significantly longer than the forward swt (more than a factor of 10). Bior3.3 was the wavelet used, and there were 8 decomposition levels. Any ideas on what accounts for the difference in execution time?
Answers (0)
Categories
Find more on Image Analysis in Help Center and File Exchange
Products
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!
