Unable to convert expression into double array.

5 views (last 30 days)
My code snippet is as follows:
syms X mu std ;
sym pi;
definite_int = inline('(2*pi*(std^2))^(-0.5)* exp(-((X-mu).^2)/(2*(std^2)))', 'X','mu','std','pi');
inte = vpaintegral(definite_int(x, mu, std, pi),[20 120])
inte = double(vpa(inte))
figure('Name','plot ');
for i = 2:20
height = 20:i:120;
ri = sum(height .* i);
error = ri - inte
plot(error, i);
hold on
end
I am getting the following error:
integration =
[ vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 60)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 62)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 64)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 66)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 68)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 70)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 72)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 74)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 76)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 78)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120), vpaintegral(exp(-(mu - 80)^2/(2*std^2))/(2*std^2*pi)^(1/2), std, 20, 120)]
Error using symengine
Unable to convert expression into double array.
Error in sym/double (line 692)
Xstr = mupadmex('symobj::double', S.s, 0);
Error in hw1>question4 (line 125)
integration = double(vpa(integration))
How should I solve this error? please help
  2 Comments
Stephen23
Stephen23 on 1 Sep 2019
Note that the inline documentation states in bold letters at the top of the page:
"inline will be removed in a future release. Use Anonymous Functions instead."
Instead of using obsolete inline, you should use efficient function handles.

Sign in to comment.

Answers (1)

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 1 Sep 2019
Using double() on the vpaintegral() result can only possibly work if you are using vpaintegral() on a formula that has exactly one unresolved symbolic variable. mu and std are unresolved in your integral as well as X, so you cannot possibly get out a symbolic numeric result from the integral.

Categories

Find more on Function Creation in Help Center and File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!