Inverse of matrix is wrong?
12 views (last 30 days)
Show older comments
I have a 583x583 matrix called "F". I am trying to use F to get a variable X for an equation FX=B. However, when I solve for X, the results do not seem correct and have negative values. When looking at the matrix F, I noticed that both codes:
X=inv(F)*B and X=F\B
yield the same results. However, I don't think that the inverse of F is correct beacuse when I multiply F by inv(F), I do not get the identity matrix. What could be the possible result of that?
The code used to construct the matrix F:
val=zeros(1,583);
j=[10,10E-1,10E-2,(9:-1:1)*(10^-3)];
val(1:12)=j;
sum_val=sum(val_norm); val_norm=val/sum_val; %normalize the function
F=toeplitz(val_norm,[val_norm(1), zeros(1,numel(val_norm)-1 )]);
and to check that X=inv(F)*B and X=F\B are the same
B=rand(583,1);
X1=inv(F)*B
X2=F\B
2 Comments
the cyclist
on 3 Nov 2021
Your code to create F gives an error:
val=zeros(1,583);
j=[10,10E-1,10E-2,(9:-1:1)*(10^-3)];
val(1:12)=j;
sum_val=sum(val_norm); val_norm=val/sum_val; %normalize the function
F=toeplitz(val_norm,[val_norm(1), zeros(1,numel(val_norm)-1 )]);
I can think of ways to fix it, but I dont want to inadvertently create a different value of F than you are.
Answers (1)
the cyclist
on 3 Nov 2021
Looks fine to me:
val=zeros(1,583);
j=[10,10E-1,10E-2,(9:-1:1)*(10^-3)];
val(1:12)=j;
sum_val=sum(val); val_norm=val/sum_val; %normalize the function
F=toeplitz(val_norm,[val_norm(1), zeros(1,numel(val_norm)-1 )]);
shouldBeIdentityMatrix = F*inv(F);
identityMatrix = eye(583);
maxError = max(abs(shouldBeIdentityMatrix(:)-identityMatrix(:)))
The maximum error between the calculated identity matrix F*inv(F) and the theoretical identify matrix is of the order of computational roundoff error.
0 Comments
See Also
Categories
Find more on Creating and Concatenating Matrices in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!