How to numerically solve and plot definite integral with variable upper limit

26 views (last 30 days)
Where, the limit is P=0:0.1:pi
I have to integrate V and then plot P versus V graph
The x axis need to take as P
clc
close all;
V= @(t) (sin(t)-(x.*cos(t)).*sin(x);
P = 0:0.1:3.1416;
plot(P,V)

Accepted Answer

Alan Stevens
Alan Stevens on 3 Mar 2022
Like so:
K= @(t) (sin(t)-t.*cos(t)).*sin(t);
P = 0:0.1:3.1416;
for i = 1:numel(P)
V(i) = integral(K,0,P(i));
end
plot(P,V),grid

More Answers (1)

John D'Errico
John D'Errico on 3 Mar 2022
Edited: John D'Errico on 3 Mar 2022
There are many trivial ways. Off the top of my head ...
  1. Repeatedly integrate, using a tool like integral, from 0 to x, then plot the result, as a function of x. This scheme is wildly inefficient, since it forces the tool to redo the integration repeatedly over the lower parts of the domain. As such, this scheme is quadratic in time, based on the length of the interval.
  2. Symbolically integrate the expresssion, with a symbolic upper limit.
  3. Use cumtrapz.
  4. Use an ODE solver, something I think many people miss as a solution.
I won't even show how to do solution 1, since it is essentially never what I would recommend. The other solutions would all have their valid purposes though. For example:
K = @(t) (sin(t) - t.*cos(t)).*sin(t)
K = function_handle with value:
@(t)(sin(t)-t.*cos(t)).*sin(t)
(Solution 2)
syms T U
Kint = int(K(T),0,U)
Kint = 
fplot(Kint,[0,pi])
xlabel t
ylabel 'Cumulative integral'
grid on
So trivial to do, as long as the expression K has an analytical integral.
(Solution 3)
t = linspace(0,pi);
dt = t(2) - t(1);
plot(t,cumtrapz(dt,K(t)))
xlabel t
ylabel 'Cumulative integral'
grid on
(Solution 4)
ODEFUN = @(t,y) K(t);
y0 = 0;
[tout,yout] = ode45(ODEFUN,[0,pi],y0);
plot(tout,yout)
xlabel t
ylabel 'Cumulative integral'
grid on
As you can see, three essentially identical solutions.
If possible, you would almost always prefer the analytical solution, since it is exact to the extent computations can offer. The cumtrapz solution is the least accurate, since it employs what is implicitly an Euler method, but cumtrapz will be blindingly fast.. Finally, the ODE solver solution is a nice one, since it offers better control over the integration error than a trapezoidal integral, but it will work when no analytical solution can be found.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!