How to do "not equal to" constraints in fmincon/Global search?
    9 views (last 30 days)
  
       Show older comments
    
    Daniela Würmseer
 on 5 Jun 2022
  
    
    
    
    
    Commented: Walter Roberson
      
      
 on 6 Jun 2022
            Is there (in the meantime) a better way than:
existing to "add" a not equal constraint to the optimization Problem?
I want to say for example "x not equal to [0,1,0,1]".
6 Comments
  Walter Roberson
      
      
 on 6 Jun 2022
				If you implemented an anti-equality constraint, fmincon would happily return the next adjacent representable number(s).
GlobalSearch is often configured to use random starting points; a trivial change in starting point is likely to return locations that are not bit-for-bit identical.
  Walter Roberson
      
      
 on 6 Jun 2022
				Matt's suggestion of requiring a minimum distance from the distinguished point might be useful for this situation.
And possibly paretosearch() instead of global search.
Accepted Answer
  Matt J
      
      
 on 6 Jun 2022
         I need to test somehow if the solution i get from Global Search is unique.
The run() command, with 5 output arguments, can return all candidate solutions located by the search
If you see that multiple solutions have the same objective value, it would indicate the solution is not unique.
1 Comment
  Walter Roberson
      
      
 on 6 Jun 2022
				... after doing uniquetol by rows to filter points that are essentially the same.
More Answers (2)
  Walter Roberson
      
      
 on 5 Jun 2022
        You could try a nonlinear equality constraint
ceq = double(isequal(x, [0 1 0 1]));
This would return 1 if the equality holds, but non-zero is disfavored. Favoured is 0 which corresponds to false which would be the case when the x is anything else.
I am not convinced that this will work well.
2 Comments
  John D'Errico
      
      
 on 5 Jun 2022
				Ugh, no. This form of constraint would be discontinuous, and fmincon presumes not only continuity, but differentiability. And since fmincon will be passing in real values for the parameters, NOT integer values, exact equality will essentially never happen anyway. So I would doubt that constraint will be of any value at all.
  Walter Roberson
      
      
 on 5 Jun 2022
				I was thinking about the continuity / differentiability when I posted that. I was thinking that it would seem plausible that you could use the nonlinear constraints to exclude (for example) a circle from consideration, and a point is a circle shrunk down to no radius. The nonlinear constraints have never been documented as being required to establish a concave area of solution.
  Matt J
      
      
 on 6 Jun 2022
        You could impose a constraint like  as a smooth approximation to
 as a smooth approximation to   .
. 
 as a smooth approximation to
 as a smooth approximation to   .
. function [c,ceq,gradc,gradceq]=nonlcon(x,r)
  ceq=[]; gradceq=[];
  gradc=[0;1;0;1]-x(:);
  c=(r^2-norm(gradc)^2)/2;
end
0 Comments
See Also
Categories
				Find more on Linear Programming and Mixed-Integer Linear Programming in Help Center and File Exchange
			
	Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!



