What do I not understand about the fft and angle functions?

12 views (last 30 days)
EDITED VERSION
I am trying to create an example showing how to use the fft function to approximate the Fourier transform. My example is to calculate the Fourier transform of h(t) = 2*pi*exp(-2*pi*t)u(t). The analytic solution is H(f) = 1/(1+jf). Here is my code:
N=1024; % sample count
T=10; % h(t) very small for t > T
t=linspace(0,T,N); % N sample points
h=2*pi*exp(-2*pi*t); % low pass IR 1 Hz cut-off
H=T*fft(h)/N; % FFT calculation of Fourier transform
Hmag=abs(H(1:N/2)); % Magnitude calculation
Hphase=180*angle(H(1:N/2))/pi; % Phase in degrees
f=(0:N/2-1)/T; % frequency bins thru Nyquist freq
subplot(2,1,1);
semilogx(f,20*log10(Hmag))
grid on
subplot(2,1,2);
semilogx(f,Hphase)
grid on
The results are shown in my response to the answer to an earlier version of my question. The magnitude plot is fairly close to the analytic result, but the phase plot goes a bit crazy at higher frequencies. Where am I going wrong?
To repeat, my goal is to show the relationship between the FFT of a discrete time function and the Fourier transform of its continuous time counterpart. I expected a closer relationship.

Accepted Answer

Star Strider
Star Strider on 6 Feb 2015
I have some problems following your code. I invite you to take the analytic approach to see if you get the same result. If you have the Symbolic Math Toolbox, try this:
syms w0 t w L real
h=w0*exp(-w0*t);
H1 = int(h * exp(-j*w*t), t, 0, 2*pi);
H2 = simplify(H1, 'steps', 10);
H3 = rewrite(H1, 'sincos');
ReH3 = simplify(real(H3), 'steps', 10)
ImH3 = simplify(imag(H3), 'steps', 10)
phas = simplify(atan(ImH3/ReH3), 'steps', 10)
fphas = matlabFunction(phas)
The last result is:
fphas = @(w,w0)atan((w.*cos(pi.*w.*2.0)-w.*exp(pi.*w0.*2.0)+w0.*sin(pi.*w.*2.0))./(-w0.*cos(pi.*w.*2.0)+w0.*exp(pi.*w0.*2.0)+w.*sin(pi.*w.*2.0)));
Plug in values for the respective variables and see what you get.
  4 Comments
Warren Koontz
Warren Koontz on 8 Feb 2015
Yes, I have now done some reading about aliasing and leakage. The problem crops up in the phase plot well before the Nyquist frequency, but it seems that inaccuracies can show up early on. Further plots show that both the real and imaginary parts of H get very small even in relatively low frequency bins. Since the phase depends on the ratio of the imaginary to the real, the inaccuracies might be more severe in the phase plot. I guess that's the way it is. Thanks for your help!!
Star Strider
Star Strider on 8 Feb 2015
My pleasure!
The phase plot depends on the atan2 function, and any calculation involving the division of two uncertain floating-point numbers is going to be even more uncertain. (There are a number of computer science professionals here who may have some thoughts on this problem. I invite their contributions.)

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!