(revised) What is the right way to apply parallel.pool.Constant on functional handle?
Show older comments
(original question) I use parfor-loop to process through rows of table/array. In each iteration, a function handle is called to do that. But this leads to a warning message that the function handle is 'a broadcast variabe' and might 'result in unnecessary communication overhead.' Is there a solution to avoid that?
(revised question) I tried parallel.pool.Constant(function_handle), and it generates an error message when calling the function: "Error using [my iteration function]. Unable to use a value of type string as an index." What is the right way to use parallel.pool.Constant(function_handle)?
function res = iteration(f, A)
% f is a function handle
C = cell(height(A),1);
parfor row = 1:height(A)
C{row} = f(A{row,:}); % f is a broadcast variable
end
res = vertcat(C{:});
end
4 Comments
Simon
on 26 Jul 2023
Simon
on 27 Jul 2023
Walter Roberson
on 27 Jul 2023
function res = iteration(f, T)
% f is a function handle
C = cell(height(T),1);
%%%%%% adding this line would generate an error message
fh = parallel.pool.Constant(f);
parfor row = 1:height(T)
C{row} = fh.Value(T{row,:});
end
res = vertcat(C{:});
end
Note: see also rowfun
Simon
on 27 Jul 2023
Accepted Answer
More Answers (0)
Categories
Find more on Variables in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!