Subscripted assignment dimension mismatch.

10 views (last 30 days)
function main
D=1; %L=0;
Pr=1;R=0.1;Sc=1;
xa=0;xb=6;
Lv = [-2.5:0.025:0];
p = [];
for i=1:length(Lv)
L = Lv(i);
fODE = @(x,y) [y(2); y(3); y(2)^2-y(3)*y(1)-1; y(5); -3*Pr*y(1)*y(5)/(3+4*R); y(7); -Sc*y(1)*y(7)];
BCres= @(ya,yb)[ya(1); ya(2)-L-D*ya(3); ya(4)-1; ya(6)-1; yb(2)-1; yb(4);yb(6)];
xint=linspace(xa,xb,101);
solinit=bvpinit(xint,[0 1 0 1 0 1 0]);
sol=bvp4c(fODE,BCres,solinit);
sxint=deval(sol,xint);
%%WE NEED TO PLOT for
S(i,1)=sxint(3,:);
end
figure(1)
plot(Lv,S,'-','Linewidth',1.5);
xlabel('\bf \lambda');
ylabel('\bf C_{f}');
hold on
end
%%While running the code following ERROR occurs:
Subscripted assignment dimension mismatch.
Error in (line 17)
S(i,1)=sxint(3,:);

Accepted Answer

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 19 May 2019
function all_sxint = main
D=1; %L=0;
Pr=1; R=0.1; Sc=1;
xa=0;xb=6;
Lv = [-2.5:0.025:0];
nLv = length(Lv);
all_sxint = cell(nLv, 1);
S = zeros(nLv, 7);
for i=1:nLv
L = Lv(i);
fODE = @(x,y) [y(2); y(3); y(2)^2-y(3)*y(1)-1; y(5); -3*Pr*y(1)*y(5)/(3+4*R); y(7); -Sc*y(1)*y(7)];
BCres= @(ya,yb)[ya(1); ya(2)-L-D*ya(3); ya(4)-1; ya(6)-1; yb(2)-1; yb(4);yb(6)];
xint=linspace(xa,xb,101);
solinit=bvpinit(xint,[0 1 0 1 0 1 0]);
sol=bvp4c(fODE,BCres,solinit);
sxint=deval(sol,xint);
all_sxint{i} = sxint;
S(i,:) = sxint(3,:);
end
figure(1)
plot(Lv, S, '-', 'Linewidth', 1.5);
xlabel('\bf \lambda');
ylabel('\bf C_{f}');
legend({'bc1', 'bc2', 'bc3', 'bc4', 'bc5', 'bc6', 'bc7'})
end
Assign the output to a variable so that you can examine all of the time points for all of the Lv values afterwards, as you indicate that you need to be able to do that.
  11 Comments
MINATI
MINATI on 20 May 2019
No we cant go beyond \lambda = - 2
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 20 May 2019
Lv = [-2.5:0.025:0]; is in your existing code

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (1)

Matt J
Matt J on 18 May 2019
Edited: Matt J on 18 May 2019
sxint(3,:) is not a scalar, but the left hand side S(i,1) is a scalar location.
  8 Comments
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 19 May 2019
Is there a reason you need to calculate at all of the time points, and then to store data for only the third time point? Is there a particular reason why my suggestion to calculate only at the third time point will not work for you?
MINATI
MINATI on 19 May 2019
Yes, Actually I need to validate a previous study with mine but unable. Since they have drawn with all points, I am trying in that way.

Sign in to comment.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!