Having problem with fixing the issue
Show older comments
Hi guys.
Here are some weird functions which I'm trying to plot. I am a novice and did a few more graphs smoothly, however, this one is a bit more tricky. Seems like I'm having some problem with sytax or so. Looking for possible help.
Thanks
Waqar
x = linspace(0,5);
y1=(-15.17006719-10.19830710*I)*((-.3397894164*2^(2/3)-2.584061447*2^(1/3)+15.96541878)*hypergeom([4.811602425], [6.811602422], -6.723676050*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x))+(-11.74363984+.3386696355*2^(2/3)+.9999999998*2^(1/3))*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x)*hypergeom([5.811602424], [7.811602422], -6.723676050*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x)))*(-exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x))^4.811602421;
plot(x,y1,'-.','Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.1, s=-0.1','LineWidth', 2.0)
xlabel('\fontname{Times New Roman} Values of x', 'FontSize', 22)
ylabel('\fontname{Times New Roman} Velocity Profile','FontSize',22')
hold on
y2=(-41.76167543-277.1087639*I)*(-exp(-.6942370405*x))^4.547612589*((0.6153550094e-1*2^(2/3)-2.648960805*2^(1/3)+5.574199339)*hypergeom([4.547612586], [6.547612585], -8.572516010*exp(-.6942370405*x))+(-4.013958993+.1566293604*2^(2/3)+1.000000000*2^(1/3))*exp(-.6942370405*x)*hypergeom([5.547612584], [7.547612587], -8.572516010*exp(-.6942370405*x)));
plot(x,y2, ':','Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.1, s=-0.3','LineWidth', 2.0)
y3=(8.054902998+2.463354463*I)*(-exp(-.8175736472*x))^3.90552941*((-2.482855195*2^(1/3)+14.73597244-.2149702398*2^(2/3))*hypergeom([3.905529413], [5.905529410], -5.761721393*exp(-.8175736472*x))+(-10.71834160+.4453954039*2^(2/3)+1.000000000*2^(1/3))*exp(-.8175736472*x)*hypergeom([4.905529411], [6.905529412], -5.761721393*exp(-.8175736472*x)));
plot(x,y3,'--','Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.2, s=-0.1','LineWidth', 2.0)
y4=(-12.45342459+98.65993194*I)*((5.141075166+.1059158437*2^(2/3)-2.574899769*2^(1/3))*hypergeom([3.460032462], [5.460032468], -7.288618279*exp(-.7424204657*x))+(-3.715037183+.1994232887*2^(2/3)+1.000000000*2^(1/3))*exp(-.7424204657*x)*hypergeom([4.460032463], [6.460032464], -7.288618279*exp(-.7424204657*x)))*(-exp(-.7424204657*x))^3.460032466;
plot(x,y4,'Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.2, s=-0.3','LineWidth', 2.0)
ax = gca;
ax.FontSize = 19;
set(gca,'XLim',[0 5]);
set(gca,'YLim',[0 1]);
set(gca,'XTick',[0 1 2 3 4 5])
box off
hold off
lgd = legend;
lgd.FontSize = 20;
lgd.Title.String = 'Values of \lambda';
legend;
legend('boxoff')
5 Comments
Walter Roberson
on 10 May 2020
Is it
or is it
?
Ke Le
on 10 May 2020
Walter Roberson
on 10 May 2020
The only thing I see obviously wrong is that
xlabel('\fontname{Times New Roman} Values of \x', 'FontSize', 22)
should be using something other than \x
I can make a guess that I is probably sqrt(-1)
You are generating complex values regardless of whether I is sqrt(-1) or is real valued. Look at your
(-exp(-.6942370405*eta))^4.547612589
exp(something) is going to be positive for real-valued eta, and - of that is going to be negative, and when that negative is raised to a fraction such as 4.54whatever then you are going to get a complex value.
Ke Le
on 10 May 2020
Walter Roberson
on 10 May 2020
Maple would generate a complex number in that situation as well.
eta := 2;
eta := 2
(-exp(-0.6942370405*eta))^4.547612589;
-0.0002697804212 + 0.001790122601 I
Answers (2)
Walter Roberson
on 10 May 2020
lambda = zeta.^(2/3)
However if you need negative values to have positive results, then
lambda = zeta.^2.^(1/3)
4 Comments
Ke Le
on 10 May 2020
Walter Roberson
on 10 May 2020
In MATLAB, * is the algebraic matrix multiplication operator, inner product. You are working with row vectors and asking to * those row vectors, which is a dimension error for inner product. You should convert all of your * to .* and all of your ^ to .^ (though you can use * or ^ if you are certain the parts are scalar.) For example,
y1=(-15.17006719-10.19830710*I)*((-.3397894164*2^(2/3)-2.584061447*2^(1/3)+15.96541878)*hypergeom([4.811602425], [6.811602422], -6.723676050*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x))+(-11.74363984+.3386696355*2^(2/3)+.9999999998*2^(1/3))*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x).*hypergeom([5.811602424], [7.811602422], -6.723676050*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x))).*(-exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x)).^4.811602421;
Ke Le
on 11 May 2020
Walter Roberson
on 11 May 2020
In the below, the character vectors for y1_, y2_, y3_, y4_ are exactly the formulas you had in your code. The below code automatically vectorizes the formulas so there will not be any mistakes.
I = 1i;
y1_ = '(-15.17006719-10.19830710*I)*((-.3397894164*2^(2/3)-2.584061447*2^(1/3)+15.96541878)*hypergeom([4.811602425], [6.811602422], -6.723676050*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x))+(-11.74363984+.3386696355*2^(2/3)+.9999999998*2^(1/3))*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x)*hypergeom([5.811602424], [7.811602422], -6.723676050*exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x)))*(-exp(-(-.3666666667+.6297451706*2^(2/3)+.1067451175*2^(1/3))*x))^4.811602421';
y2_ = '(-41.76167543-277.1087639*I)*(-exp(-.6942370405*x))^4.547612589*((0.6153550094e-1*2^(2/3)-2.648960805*2^(1/3)+5.574199339)*hypergeom([4.547612586], [6.547612585], -8.572516010*exp(-.6942370405*x))+(-4.013958993+.1566293604*2^(2/3)+1.000000000*2^(1/3))*exp(-.6942370405*x)*hypergeom([5.547612584], [7.547612587], -8.572516010*exp(-.6942370405*x)))';
y3_ = '(8.054902998+2.463354463*I)*(-exp(-.8175736472*x))^3.90552941*((-2.482855195*2^(1/3)+14.73597244-.2149702398*2^(2/3))*hypergeom([3.905529413], [5.905529410], -5.761721393*exp(-.8175736472*x))+(-10.71834160+.4453954039*2^(2/3)+1.000000000*2^(1/3))*exp(-.8175736472*x)*hypergeom([4.905529411], [6.905529412], -5.761721393*exp(-.8175736472*x)))';
y4_ = '(-12.45342459+98.65993194*I)*((5.141075166+.1059158437*2^(2/3)-2.574899769*2^(1/3))*hypergeom([3.460032462], [5.460032468], -7.288618279*exp(-.7424204657*x))+(-3.715037183+.1994232887*2^(2/3)+1.000000000*2^(1/3))*exp(-.7424204657*x)*hypergeom([4.460032463], [6.460032464], -7.288618279*exp(-.7424204657*x)))*(-exp(-.7424204657*x))^3.460032466';
y1 = str2fun(['@(x,I)', vectorize(y1_)]);
y2 = str2fun(['@(x,I)', vectorize(y2_)]);
y3 = str2fun(['@(x,I)', vectorize(y3_)]);
y4 = str2fun(['@(x,I)', vectorize(y4_)]);
x = linspace(0,5);
plot(x,y1(x,I),'-.','Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.1, s=-0.1','LineWidth', 2.0)
xlabel('\fontname{Times New Roman} Values of x', 'FontSize', 22)
ylabel('\fontname{Times New Roman} Velocity Profile','FontSize',22')
hold on
plot(x,y2(x,I), ':','Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.1, s=-0.3','LineWidth', 2.0)
plot(x,y3(x,I),'--','Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.2, s=-0.1','LineWidth', 2.0)
plot(x,y4(x,I),'Color','[0 0 0]','DisplayName','\fontname {Helvetica} \fontsize{20} \kappa;=0.2, s=-0.3','LineWidth', 2.0)
ax = gca;
ax.FontSize = 19;
set(gca,'XLim',[0 5]);
set(gca,'YLim',[0 1]);
set(gca,'XTick',[0 1 2 3 4 5])
box off
hold off
lgd = legend;
lgd.FontSize = 20;
lgd.Title.String = 'Values of \lambda';
legend;
legend('boxoff')
Ke Le
on 12 May 2020
0 votes
4 Comments
Walter Roberson
on 12 May 2020
You accepted your own Answer, which implies that you came up with a different solution that works for you when the other Answers do not. It would be beneficial for you to post that alternative solution so that people could study it and see how your needs turned out to differ from what volunteers came up with.
Ke Le
on 21 May 2020
Walter Roberson
on 21 May 2020
[number] asks MATLAB to build a vector that contains only the number. But in MATLAB every scalar is the exact same thing as a vector of length 1, so as far as MATLAB is concerned, [123] has an identical run-time representation as 123 without [] . The only difference is small run-time penalty.
The y1_ etc version automatically vectorizes so that you do not need to make the changes yourself (potentially missing some of them)
Ignoring the imaginary part is an important change though.
Ke Le
on 8 Jun 2020
Categories
Find more on Logical in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!