MATLAB Answers

Calling script from a function is recommended?

21 views (last 30 days)
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 10 Apr 2021
Commented: Bruno Luong on 10 Apr 2021
Now and then I call script from a function, the purspose is often initialize some constant values that are shared by across the program.
function myfun
% ...
where initialize_cst.m is the script, typically
mycst1 = 1;
mypi = pi
% ....
This seem to "poof" thos constants into the function, and the consencus seems to be avoid (at least that is one of the argument where EVAL is not recommend).
If that is the case JIT should not activated with poofing, and I should see some effect in the runtime.
However I do this test and fail to see any effect
function s = foo()
%a = 1:1e6;
bar() % poof a = 1:1e6;"
s = 0;
for i=1:length(a)
s = s + a(i);
where bar.m is the poofing script
% bar.m
a = 1:1e6;
What I obtain with tic/toc is
>> tic; for i=1:100, foo(); end, toc
Elapsed time is 0.440625 seconds.
Then if I comment the poofing bar and initialize directly a within the function
>> tic; for i=1:100, foo(); end, toc
Elapsed time is 0.421612 seconds.
The timing seems pretty close to me.
My question is then: is variables poof by script really make more harm?
I also open to otherway to share constants than calling script within function. So please feel free to suggest alternative solution.

Answers (2)

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson on 10 Apr 2021
% bar.m
fid = fopen('baz.m', 'w'); fprintf(fid,'beta = 1:1e6;\n'); fclose(fid)
ans = 0
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes ans 1x1 8 double fid 1x1 8 double
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes ans 1x1 8 double beta 1x1000000 8000000 double fid 1x1 8 double
Name Size Bytes Class Attributes beta 1x1000000 8000000 double
Not enough input arguments.

Error in beta (line 19)
y = exp(betaln(z,w));

Error in solution>foo (line 15)
for i=1:length(beta)
function s = foo()
baz() % poof beta = 1:1e6;"
s = 0;
for i=1:length(beta)
s = s + beta(i);
So whos says that beta was poofed into the function workspace, but you cannot take length(beta) because somehow the function beta was invoked instead ?
This is documented behaviour as of a few releases back, an explicit change to the execution engine:
When a function contains a reference to a name that is not defined explicitly (parameter, shared variable, assignment statement in scope), and that name is the name of a function in scope, then at execution time, the name shall refer to the function, even if a variable by the same name is poofed into execution.
Names are bound to functions at parse time now unless the name is in scope referring to a variable, or unless an assignment to the variable is present in the code.
Yes, this does mean that poofing constants in by way of a script is reduced functionality .
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 10 Apr 2021
To be clear:
My question is exactly to find out if the variable get really poofed or MATLAB still parse the script, or still get JIT functioning somehow.
I won't try to get MATLAB fool, in contrary.
If seems the variable created by the script get poofed but it seems there is no major penalty in tterm of speed.
Can I say that?

Sign in to comment.

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 10 Apr 2021
Edited: Bruno Luong on 10 Apr 2021
MATLAB coder cannot work on script inside function

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!