why, oh, why is the test suite exactly the same as the expected solution?
Isn't 10.^(0:0.01:1) more precise?
What? This should work. I hate computer precission!
This approach should work as well, but the results are not exactly equal (<1e-14 error). I suggest adding a tolerance to the test suite.
Perhaps, in the test-suite, you could account for small imprecisions? This would allow for answers that don't use the logspace command.
I agree; not accounting for imprecision is bad numerical practice.
Rotate input square matrix 90 degrees CCW without rot90
Create a vector whose elements depend on the previous element
Is it an Armstrong number?
Swap two numbers
Matlab Basics II - Minimum
05 - Vector Equations 1
03 - Matrix Variables 6
07 - Common functions and indexing 4
07 - Common functions and indexing 1
07 - Common functions and indexing 5
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office