Daniel Turizo - MATLAB Cody - MATLAB Central

Daniel Turizo

3109
Rank
6
Badges
1105
Score
View Community Profile
51 – 100 of 200

Daniel Turizo liked Solution 1305069

on 22 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Solution 1308504

This problem was so difficult for me to solve, would you mind explaining what search algorithm did you implement? Thanks.

on 22 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44387. Birthday cake

That right. I am also using an analytical solution and I had to introduce that ugly 1.0003 factor too.

on 21 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44316. Pandigital Multiples of 11 (based on Project Euler 491)

Quite right James! It took me some time to fix the repeating combinations error, but it was worth :D

on 21 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44378. Five-dimensional maze

Can you please further explain the coding of the walls? I have already solved the 2D problem, but I still don't get the wall encoding in 5D. The end position is always encoded as 31, but wouldn't 31 mean the end position has walls in all dimensions, thus making inaccessible?.

on 20 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44387. Birthday cake

The last two cases have a solution of 258.83 and 517.65, I am getting 258.82 and 517.64 respectively. Is this intended and I am wrong? or is it just numerical roundoff?

on 20 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Solution 1291915

Does the problem statement have a typo?, it says 2310 is a pandigital number of order 4, but it should be 3, right?

on 19 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44377. Five steps to enlightenment

Thank you very much! I was missing that condition, but I have fixed it now.

on 19 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44377. Five steps to enlightenment

It is possible to check test case 17? I have done it by hand and what I got is that It is not possible for Scott to assert statement 5, because are are two possible solutions: [4,18] and [6,16]. I am also getting the same result of two possible solutions in cases 14 and 18. Thank you very much.

on 19 Oct 2017

Daniel Turizo submitted a Comment to Problem 44377. Five steps to enlightenment

It is possible to check test case 17? I have done it by hand and what I got is that It is not possible for Scott to assert statement 5, because are are two possible solutions: [4,18] and [6,16]. Thank you very much.

on 19 Oct 2017
51 – 100 of 200
Go to top of page